Terminator Salvation: The Essential Edition

Terminator Salvation: The Essential Edition

 
8.4 (14)
534   0   1   0   0
 
Terminator Salvation: The Essential Edition
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie Title:
Franchise:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
2009
Original Running Time:
117
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
102
Time Cut:
15
Available in HD?
Brief Synopsis:
This is a simplified take on McG’s Terminator Salvation. Irrelevant, useless and unbelievable subplots have been removed in order to create movie that now focuses on the war effort itself.
Intention:
When Terminator Salvation was announced I was nervous. The main reason for this nervousness was McG. I didn’t think he was a competent enough of a director to pull it off. Then the third preview was released. Even though gave away a major plot point it still looked like it might be a good film, and my hope was boosted.

After I saw Terminator Salvation I was disappointed. They added so much crap to try and fool the audience into believing it was a smart film it completely bogged it down. The entire opening with Marcus in prison completely ruined his reveal later in the film. Skynet capturing and bringing Reese to their main base to bring Connor to them was stupid. (Why didn’t Skynet just kill Reese?). The setup of Marcus having a heart so he could give it to Connor at the end was dumb. (I don’t buy for a minute they could do open heart surgery in the middle of the desert decades after a nuclear war.)

I figured removing many of these elements might improve the film. Thus, Terminator Salvation: The Essential Edition was made. Now the film is more about the actual war.
image
Release Information
AVCHD (DVD-9)
Special Features
- Text Commentary Track
- the original 3 theatrical trailers
Cuts and Additions:
- cut the opening credits
- cut opening scene in the prison
- cut the POV of the missile before the strike
- cut an early encounter between John Connor and a terminator popping out of the water
- replaced Sarah Connor’s cassette audio with her recording from the first Terminator film
- cut scene with Marcus and Blair in the rain
- cut the machines identifying Kyle Reese
- cut much of Marcus having a heart
- cut final scene in desert
- change end credit music
- cut a lot of bits of dialog and shots throughout
Cover art by Q2 (DOWNLOAD HERE)
image

User reviews

14 reviews

 
(5)
 
(8)
 
(1)
3-5 stars
 
(0)
1-3 stars
 
(0)
Overall rating 
 
8.4
 
10.0  (3)
 
10.0  (2)
 
10.0  (2)
 
6.5  (2)
 
8.2  (14)
View all reviews View most helpful
(Updated: September 05, 2012)
Enjoyment 
 
8.0

August 19, 2012 @ 3:55 am

Q2′s work has served as an introduction to fan edits for me. I’ve always wanted to make one myself, but didn’t find this community until recently.

My first exposure to fan edit was Q2′s Phantom Menace. An amazing job technically (the pod race was an exceptional improvement), but unfortunately that movie just has a poor story line. I had high hopes but was moderately let down, due in no fault to the work of Q2.

Terminator Salvation, however, is a movie that exists for no other reason then balls to the wall action. Bale is psycho status in this one. For me, that’s a good thing. The film runs on pure adrenaline, and story comes second. All it needed to do was stay out of the way of the action. Leave it to McG to mess up a sure thing.

Yet now, somehow, this film has been redeemed. It would be impossible to remove every single cliché, wink/nudge, or poorly delivered line of dialog, but what Q2 has created is a VASTLY SUPERIOR film to the one I first saw in theaters 3 years ago.

The edit is absolutely seamless. The pacing perfect. At no point was I bored. Eye rolling was at a minimum. The new intro set the tone and clip perfectly for the rest of the film. And the new conclusion works better then I could have imagined it.

The only complaints I have left are aimed at the original film makers more then anything else. I still wish Helena Bonham Carter’s character could be completely eliminated. But I realize this would be extremely difficult to pull off (impossible?). And Anton Yelchin was horribly miscast. He becomes Michael Biehn? I think not.

Addressing other reviewers concerns:
I suppose the inability of Skynet to properly identify and handle Kyle Reese is a bit of a hole. It would make more sense if they never knew they even had him. Q2 addressed this somewhat, but there is still that one scene where it shows what cell Kyle is in.

I think the canceled attack of Skynet was handled beautifully. It cuts out an over the top speech (didn’t we already have enough of those?) and honestly, it was redundant in the first place. The commander on the sub explains it for us when he blatantly says “They wont attack unless Connor gives the order” If your dialog is unabashed exposition, at least don’t make it repetitive exposition.

Finally, the transition to the attempted rape of Moon Bloodgood’s character seemed totally fluid to me. Not really sure where people’s complaints are coming from on this one.

Wrapping up, I’d give the original movie a 6/10. I’d give Q2s version an 8/10.
I’ll be burning this copy for all my friends. (Yes they own the original) And I cant wait to see what else this community has to offer me. Cheers!

Was this review helpful to you? 
(Updated: September 05, 2012)
Enjoyment 
 
8.0

September 18, 2011 @ 10:05 pm

Just finished watching this edit & I have to say it’s a big improvement over the original. I applaud Q2 & as of now it is my master version of Terminator Salvation.

There were two stand out problems with the edit in my mind.

#1. There was a problem with the video in the Marcus flashback prison sequence where I had a green line appear & disappear on the right side of the screen. Could be a burn problem IDK.

#2. I really liked the way Q2 tweaked the story but as TV’s Frink mentioned above the scene where Marcus finds the cell where Kyle is held is the big stand out problem since skynet hasn’t identified him yet so he shouldn’t be in the database. If there was a way to cut the whole let me know what cell kyle is in part it would be better but I realize the problem of John just stumbling across kyle by chance. Not sure how this could be resolved.

So because of this story problem I have to give this edit a score of 8 & it is a part of my Terminator film collection.

Was this review helpful to you? 
(Updated: September 05, 2012)
Overall rating 
 
6.5
Audio/Video Quality 
 
10.0
Visual Editing 
 
10.0
Audio Editing 
 
10.0
Narrative 
 
5.0
Enjoyment 
 
5.0

December 10, 2011 @ 4:50 am

I originally rated this back in December 2011 and am writing a review in September 2012, so I don't remember everything. The tech quality (as is usual with Q2 edits) was spectacular. The entertainment and story on the other hand were still painful as hell for me to watch the entire movie. Not enough was cut for my tastes. So if you more or less liked T4 (as opposed to hating every second of it) you'll probably get a kick out of this edit.

Was this review helpful to you? 
(Updated: September 05, 2012)
Enjoyment 
 
10.0

June 21, 2011 @ 3:34 pm

*This rating was given before reviews were required*

Was this review helpful to you? 
(Updated: September 05, 2012)
Enjoyment 
 
8.0

October 13, 2010 @ 3:21 am

This edit does accomplish the need to remove the most unnecessary and distracting plot points (opening flashback sequence and heart transplant), but I can’t help but think it still needs more work. I have a hard time with the scene where skynet poses as the doctor’s image before Marcus to explain the whole purpose of his existence. To me skynet should be faceless unemotional computer making computational decisions to remove humans not reasoning with one its’ creations just because he has a human element to him. I think we understand that Marcus was created by skynet as mole once he’s captured. This edit is very close to being perfect and I very much enjoyed the recut beginning as well as many of the other minor cuts throughout. Althought this cut is technically very well done it could still use some creative work to enhance the plot for entertainment value I’m afraid. 8/10 rating

Was this review helpful to you? 
View all user reviews