No Time To Die: The Traditional Cut

Featured
Updated
 
9.5 (11)
2047 0 1 0 3

User reviews

11 reviews
 
73%
 
27%
5-7 stars
 
0%
3-5 stars
 
0%
1-3 stars
 
0%
Overall rating
 
9.5
Audio/Video Quality
 
9.6(11)
Audio Editing
 
9.2(11)
Visual Editing
 
9.5(11)
Narrative
 
9.6(11)
Enjoyment
 
9.5(11)
Back to Listing
11 results - showing 1 - 5
1 2 3
Ordering
(Updated: February 18, 2023)
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
This is our 4th time watching No Time To Die. We like it.

So many details became clear in this edit. One example would be the increased impact of Dr. Swan's trauma and ties; when we meet the villain for the first time. I knew the ending would be changed, but I didn't expect other edits that seem to strengthen the story.

The ending was sweet and uplifting. A good reason to recommend this editor's hard work and vision.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
Digital
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 2 0
(Updated: May 13, 2023)
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
It's been a long time since I watched No Time To Die properly. I only saw it once when I went to the cinema, which is rare for me as a Bond fan. When a new film is out, I go to see it as many times as I can. This was different. I felt like I watched my childhood getting thrown into a bonfire and Daniel Craig smirking back with glee as he did it.

I was angry, disappointed but most of all, depressed. After two years of lockdowns and social distancing, I for one was looking forward to going back to the cinema. I wanted fun, entertainment but most of all, an escape from the real world. That's what cinema should do, provide a sweet distraction for an hour or two. Even back in the 1930's, the film industry got that. Shame, they don't get that now.

While my biggest issue with the film was the ending, I did feel that the film was disappointing in other areas. Firstly, the opening sequence was far too long and dumb moments like, release the sheep or you'll die and Vesper's (conveniently located and impressively sized) mausoleum. Bond screaming, how did they know he was there. Really?

After escaping SPECTRE, why does Bond put Madeline on a train and part ways with her (doesn't that make her more vulnerable to getting caught, like in the previous film??). Why was there little to no security in a building developing a biological weapon signed off by MI6? Why would someone like Mallory (M) go against his morals as seen in previous films to sign off on such a project in the first place. Because, a twist. Lazy and inconsistent writing. I'm sick of this trope in films these days, unintentional villains.

Some of the dialogue was a bit off too, like Bond's rant at Blofeld, too flippant, even for Bond. The juvenile dialogue back and forth between Bond and Nomi at MI6. Be professional, guys. Please? You're grown adults, talk like it. Then there's, Safin. Safin.... Ugh.... Another missed opportunity there. A villain blander than a rice cake. Even Kamal Khan (one of the most pointless villains in the Bond series) had more presence than Safin. Even if he was a jewel smuggling dandy, better that than Mr Whispers in No Time To Die.

Things I did like, Bond and Felix's friendship. I really loved this. Shame this too was wasted in part, too short a reunion. But I did cry in the cinema as I did when I watched the fanedit during Felix's death.

Paloma. Ah, Paloma. You firecracker, you! So bubbly, warm and energetic. Nice to have these kind of characters back in the series. Again, too short. More Paloma, less Nomi. If you had Paloma's character replace all of Nomi's bits, you have a better movie and tighter narrative. Another missed opportunity.

The score is stunning. One of the better scores during Craig's era. Especially after the bland score for Spectre. Not so fond of the title track by Billie Ellish. Then again, I'm not a fan of Ms Ellish's work or of contemporary pop music in general. Too mumbly, like the poor lass needs a throat lozenge or something. Oh dear.

Bond and Madeline's relationship does come across much stronger here than in the previous film which is a little jarring at first but gradually improves. The action sequences are as always still impressive.

While No Time To Die will never be a strong favourite for me, this fanedit however has made it a film worth re-watching. The new opening is tighter and straight to the point. Some minor cuts here and there, much better pacing than the original. The prologue edited into a flashback during the appointment with Madeline was beautifully cut in, improves the narrative and milks the mystery for a rewarding reveal.

The late Alfred Hitchcock once said, "The length of a film should be directly related to the endurance of the human bladder." He was right.

The original theatrical version was too long and as I recall, my bladder was beginning to hurt two thirds of the way into the film. This is where the overall pace of the new edit is, again, much better. This is a Bond film, not Tolstoy. A Bond film should be streamlined and not overly complicated. Scott Crane understands this.

The whole reason this fanedit was worth the wait was the new ending. A nice little coda to end this era of Bond. With all the loose ends finally tied up. Bond and co. can finally live in peace without looking over their shoulders. Had the original film ended this way, it would have felt less contrived and cliched. Another reason I detest most films these days, killing off the hero is getting increasingly dull and predictable. More than that, it's unnecessary and depressing. Remember when films used to be fun?

Scott Crane, you saved James Bond and cured my depression. When's my next appointment, Doctor Crane?


User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
Digital
T
Top 1000 Reviewer 3 reviews
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 2 0
Overall rating
 
8.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
8.0
Audio Editing
 
7.0
Visual Editing
 
9.0
Narrative
 
8.0
Enjoyment
 
8.0
This edit significantly improves "No Time to Die" in multiple ways, most notably the ending and pacing. The way that the ending is edited is very well-done and easily the centerpiece of this edit. The one quibble that I have is that it would maybe have been better to leave in a little more of the final Bond/Safin fight scene, but that would be difficult with the available material.

The image quality is fairly good for the file size (10.6 GB), although a larger file size and higher bitrate would have been very welcome.

The weakest link of this edit is the audio editing, as there were several moments where audio cuts were noticeable due to clicks or other sounds. The visual editing is excellent.

The narrative is an improvement over the original. Bits of it are a bit thin storywise due to some of the excisions, but this probably couldn't helped.

This version is more enjoyable than the original and feels more like a proper (albeit still flawed) James Bond movie, and a decent farewell to Daniel Craig's version of the character.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
Digital
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
(Updated: February 19, 2023)
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
YOU SAVED THIS MOVIE AND BOND!

After that catalclysimically bad SPECTRE, I had high hopes for this final Craig outing as the pandemic pushed the realese date out further and further. However, unlike TOP GUN MAVERICK, where it is clear the makers polished the movie to within an inch of its like and released a superb piec of popcor movie making which you can't help but enjoy, the makers of this 007 movie seem to have bloated it or just left on the shelf.

There is no question that it could have been trimmed by 30 mins, and though this edit does not do that, what it does do is remove som of that bloat, corrects many flawed moments (including the ending) and does so with a deft hand.

I did spot a couple issue which the editor actually immediatly addressed, one of them being solved with a new VFX which he expertly delivered and I did not expect frankly. Unaddressed this would have scored a 9 on visual editing.

The result of these trims as noted previously is that every not only becomes clearer, but it is also more engaging for it.

I still believe this could be tightened further, but i don't much care for the original movie overall I can't penalise the editor for that ...hence my enjoyment is a 10, because I defo enjoyed it as much as I could have. and unlike the original version, I was actually drawn in. That is saying a lot in my book.

For those that enjoyed the original, this is superior.

Highly Recommended!
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
Overall rating
 
9.8
Audio/Video Quality
 
9.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
No Time To Die is a decent thriller, but a pretty lacking Bond film for several obvious reasons. This edit seeks to excise some of the original’s more egregious faux pas, with considerable success.

The two most obvious changes are to the opening and the ending. Using a gun barrel opening that contains blood looks like a small change on paper, but instantly conjures the Bond feel that the artsy fartsy original lacked. So too does the complete re-editing of the pre-credits sequence to a far more traditional action scene, with the moving of the overlong and poorly placed flashback sequence to later in the film lending it a more logical context.

The original ending is indicative of the studio and directors they’re hiring having an abject distaste for the Bond franchise and what it stands for, but the edits here again improve this immensely. Although the edits are somewhat more visible than they are in the opening sequence, the original footage is nevertheless used creatively to effectively construct a far superior ending that’s more befitting of the franchise.

The final package feels considerably more like a traditional Bond film, although there are flaws that can’t be fixed such as the weakness of the villain, Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s drum-banging handprints all over the script or the sight of Daniel Craig stomping around with the suaveness of Mr Potato Head.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
Digital
P
2 reviews
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
11 results - showing 1 - 5
1 2 3