Review Detail
7.7 12 10
FanMix
August 12, 2012
4201
(Updated: September 08, 2012)
Overall rating
7.6
Audio/Video Quality
7.0
Audio Editing
7.0
Visual Editing
9.0
Narrative
7.0
Enjoyment
8.0
July 28, 2012 @ 9:00 am
On the whole, this was great. Very fun edit. I loved the concept, the look and feel of it all.
My biggest complaints though are that often the serial structure didn’t quite work. The breaking points half the time felt a bit unnatural. I think this could have easily been avoided with a little bit more editing of the film itself.
FANEDIT RATING – 7
Audio/Video Quality – 7 (as noted in the description, video quality isn’t the highest)
Visual Editing – 9
Audio Editing – 7
Degree of Editing – 7
(NOTE: “Degree of Editing” is a 100% arbitrary rating that I keep in mind when reviewing edits. This is not meant to insinuate that a faneditor is lazy or not. Some fanedits require a lot more work than others and I take this into account.)
MOVIE RATING – 8
Narrative – 7
Enjoyment – 8 (original is a 10)
OVERALL RATING – 7
On the whole, this was great. Very fun edit. I loved the concept, the look and feel of it all.
My biggest complaints though are that often the serial structure didn’t quite work. The breaking points half the time felt a bit unnatural. I think this could have easily been avoided with a little bit more editing of the film itself.
FANEDIT RATING – 7
Audio/Video Quality – 7 (as noted in the description, video quality isn’t the highest)
Visual Editing – 9
Audio Editing – 7
Degree of Editing – 7
(NOTE: “Degree of Editing” is a 100% arbitrary rating that I keep in mind when reviewing edits. This is not meant to insinuate that a faneditor is lazy or not. Some fanedits require a lot more work than others and I take this into account.)
MOVIE RATING – 8
Narrative – 7
Enjoyment – 8 (original is a 10)
OVERALL RATING – 7
N