Review Detail
9.9 5 10Overall rating
9.8
Audio/Video Quality
10.0
Audio Editing
10.0
Visual Editing
10.0
Narrative
9.0
Enjoyment
10.0
I didn’t understand the need to repeat the opening scene (which I thought was a great choice, in the first place, for setting the stage for the film), the viewers remember it and nothing is gained by repeating it. An abridged version might have worked, though.
On another note, what a great ending; it shows the impact an apparently simple editing choice may have on a narrative.
The jumps between timelines were very well done, the scenes hinted at the setting with no need for any on-screen text (which would have been a mistake here). Also, for a 3h long film, the pacing is really well managed. The score is also used effectively.
On another note, what a great ending; it shows the impact an apparently simple editing choice may have on a narrative.
The jumps between timelines were very well done, the scenes hinted at the setting with no need for any on-screen text (which would have been a mistake here). Also, for a 3h long film, the pacing is really well managed. The score is also used effectively.
User Review
Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
Digital
G