Mummy, The: Year of the Scorpion

Updated
 
7.6 (7)
4471 0 1 0 2

User reviews

7 reviews
9-10 stars
 
0%
 
71%
 
29%
3-5 stars
 
0%
1-3 stars
 
0%
Overall rating
 
7.6
Audio/Video Quality
 
8.5(4)
Audio Editing
 
7.0(4)
Visual Editing
 
7.8(4)
Narrative
 
7.5(4)
Enjoyment
 
7.2(7)
Back to Listing
7 results - showing 6 - 7
1 2
Ordering
(Updated: September 09, 2012)
Enjoyment
 
8.0
A good edit. There are some “rough” areas that are noticeable but don’t really detract from the overall viewing.

I especially liked the “film restoration” style of this edit. Gaith took the worst part of this movie (the opening with The Rock) and made it a fun, classic horror movie part (much like the original 1930′s “The Mummy”). Gaith might have over-used the “damaged film” look a little too much in the opeing and there is a very rough edit/cut/transition to the main movie at this point, but overall it is a great start to a mediocre movie. The fade in and fade outs are a little too long (while dialogue has started or is still going as the fade starts/stops), but gain not so long as to seriously detract from the edit.

I DL’d the DVD version and the overall quality is good (4 out of 5), audio is good too (4/5).

Gaith has taken, for me, a very disappoiting film and made it a much better experience. I have a feeling others might take issue with the drastic reduction of “action”, but for me, it was what was needed. Honestly, I get very bored with long action scenes. I am glad Evy the re-icarnation plot references are gon as well as the too long Pygmy attack scenes – without the long-winded pygmy scenes, the movie becomes MUCH more quick-paced without losing plot.

Review by flyboy707 — December 14, 2009 @ 10:10 PM
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
Overall rating
 
6.8
Audio/Video Quality
 
9.0
Audio Editing
 
6.0
Visual Editing
 
6.0
Narrative
 
7.0
Enjoyment
 
6.0
I commend you for removing the annoying Evey reincarnation and Rick Medjai subplots and other such annoyances. However, I don't feel that your version managed to make "The Mummy Returns" into a better movie. There are too many annoyances to remove, and despite removing many flaws, your edit felt like it somehow made the remaining ones seem even worse. Also, there were too many noticeable cuts, which caused the editing to feel sloppy at many points.

While I like what you tried to do with this edit and feel that some of your changes were improvements, I feel that overall, it didn't work well. I, like you, consider "The Mummy" (1999) the best archeology-themed adventure movie since the original Indiana Jones trilogy, and its sequel far inferior to it. However, while you did remove some of the flaws of "The Mummy Returns", I am sad to say that I enjoyed your edit even less than the original movie.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
No
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
7 results - showing 6 - 7
1 2