Lost in Translation Dluppers Fan Edit

Lost in Translation Dluppers Fan Edit

 
7.0 (2)
184   0   1   0   0
 
Lost in Translation Dluppers Fan Edit
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie Title:
Genre:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
2003
Original Running Time:
104
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
86
Time Cut:
19
Time Added:
1
Brief Synopsis:
By removing all the unwanted characters and scenes the focus is kept directly on Bob and Charlotte.
Intention:
i wanted the film to just be about bob and charlotte and i felt the kelly(anna farris) charactor,just didn’t belong and wasn’t needed at all.so all mention and sight of the charactor was removed and she isn’t missed one bit :),i also removed the bob/bar singer affair,i felt it went against the bob charactor,so it was removed,along with the following scene with bob and charlotte in the cafe talking about it.
Editing Details:
i removed all unwanted characters and scenes to keep the focus directly on bob and charlotte
Cuts and Additions:

Cuts removed :

-the introduction scene between kelly(anna faris) and charlotte in the hotel lobby
-kelly and charlotte/with husbanb in hotel bar
-kelly’s movie press conference in hotel while charlotte is wondering around
-kelly singing in the bar
-bob playing golf,cut so a deleted scene fitted better
-bob meeting the red haired bar singer and sleeping with her/morning after
-bob and charlotte’s dinner after he has slept with the bar singer
-any other mention of bob with the bar singer were cut

scene added :

-the morning after charlotte and bob had the night of karaoke,charlotte rings bob to wake him up and arrange to go for breakfast.
Cover art by dluppers (DOWNLOAD HERE)
image

User reviews

2 reviews

Enjoyment 
 
7.0  (0)
(Updated: September 17, 2012)
Enjoyment 
 
8.0

Review by jjrdias — December 1, 2008 @ 2:51 am

*This rating was given before reviews were required*

Was this review helpful to you? 
(Updated: September 17, 2012)
Enjoyment 
 
6.0

Review by Ghostcut — December 1, 2008 @ 1:35 am

I mildly enjoyed the original film and this edit too, but really I’m not sure which is better. I wouldn’t call LIT a film needing improving but it was nice to see an alternate take. 3 stars.

Was this review helpful to you?