Review Detail
7.7 4 10
(Updated: September 16, 2012)
Overall rating
7.5
Audio Editing
10.0
Visual Editing
6.0
Narrative
8.0
Enjoyment
6.0
Review by Neglify — August 7, 2012 @ 9:28 pm
(I watched and rated this edit in Dec 2011 and never left a review.)
This was a fun edit. It was great to see how this movie could have looked, but the grindhouse effect was a little annoying at times.
(ADDED 16 September 2012)
And now that I look back on it, this really isn't a grindhouse film. It's just basically degrading the picture and adding the alternate ending.
FANEDIT RATING
Audio/Video Quality - N/A due to intention of editor
Visual Editing – 6 (the edits were fine, but the fake grindhouse effect was unneeded for me)
Audio Editing – 10
Degree of Editing – 6
(NOTE: “Degree of Editing” is a 100% arbitrary rating that I keep in mind when reviewing edits. This is not meant to insinuate that a faneditor is lazy or not. Some fanedits require a lot more work than others and I take this into account.)
MOVIE RATING
Narrative – 8 (original is 8)
Enjoyment – 6 (original is 8)
(I watched and rated this edit in Dec 2011 and never left a review.)
This was a fun edit. It was great to see how this movie could have looked, but the grindhouse effect was a little annoying at times.
(ADDED 16 September 2012)
And now that I look back on it, this really isn't a grindhouse film. It's just basically degrading the picture and adding the alternate ending.
FANEDIT RATING
Audio/Video Quality - N/A due to intention of editor
Visual Editing – 6 (the edits were fine, but the fake grindhouse effect was unneeded for me)
Audio Editing – 10
Degree of Editing – 6
(NOTE: “Degree of Editing” is a 100% arbitrary rating that I keep in mind when reviewing edits. This is not meant to insinuate that a faneditor is lazy or not. Some fanedits require a lot more work than others and I take this into account.)
MOVIE RATING
Narrative – 8 (original is 8)
Enjoyment – 6 (original is 8)
N