Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull: Q2 Edition

Updated
 
8.8 (16)
6888 0 1 0 11

User reviews

13 reviews with 7-9 stars
16 reviews
 
19%
 
81%
5-7 stars
 
0%
3-5 stars
 
0%
1-3 stars
 
0%
Overall rating
 
8.8
Audio/Video Quality
 
9.0(8)
Audio Editing
 
9.0(7)
Visual Editing
 
8.7(7)
Narrative
 
9.2(7)
Enjoyment
 
8.3(16)
Back to Listing
13 results - showing 6 - 10
1 2 3
Ordering
(Updated: September 12, 2012)
Enjoyment
 
8.0
October 25, 2010

*This rating was given before reviews were required*
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
(Updated: September 12, 2012)
Enjoyment
 
8.0
September 1, 2010

Indy 4.. Why George? Why?. No need to recount the colossal FAIL that this movie turned out to be despite it’s insane Box Office receipts. If you’re reading this, you know the history.

Q2 has done an admirable job of improving the worst of the Indy franchise, a worth wile watch for anyone that wants to watch a more tolerable version of Crystal Skull.

Technical Quality
I watched the Single Layer DVD 5 on a 52″ Plasma. The image quality was overall very good, I noticed no artifacting or outrageous compression. For a SL presentation, it was right where you’d expect it to be. Audio quality was fine, I didn’t have to fuss with the volume for adjustment purposes of correcting sudden level changes. Well done.

Editing/Entertainment
The Good: Q2′s handling of the Nuclear Test sequence was simply fantastic. It flowed wonderfully and if you ‘d never seen the original, you’d never have noticed anything was missing, it goes to show just how useless this sequence was. Likewise, I love the truncated motorcycle chase. It was over-the-top silly and out of place in the Indy Universe in my opinion. Mutt/Tarzan is also deftly handled, more kudos for how this was handled. The worst of the most offending dialog has been removed and again, as a viewer we are none-the-wiser.
The Bad: Most glaringly there were a few flash-frames in various places. Some have been noted by previous reviewers, and I also noticed two in the back of the transport as our heroes are beginning their escape. Beyond that, I simply wish Q2 would have been even more aggressive in his edit. As much as was removed, much more could have been taken out without detracting from the narrative.

Overall Enjoyment
Q2′s edit is a definite improvement over the original. The movie still suffers from serious flaws, many far beyond the reach of editing for correction. But if you want to watch Indy 4 as part of an Indy marathon, well, this far superior to the original and cuts out the worst excesses of the original.

Overall Rating
8/10
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
(Updated: September 12, 2012)
Enjoyment
 
8.0
August 23, 2010

What else can I say that hasn’t already been posted? A very solid edit, Most of the other reviews here hit the nail on the head. I only noticed two or three cuts. The first one was the library, which was a memorable sequence in the original (for better or worse). The second and third cuts I noticed were to the start of the jungle chase sequence while Indy and company were taking over the truck. This was due to a couple “flash frames,” or single frames from shots that had been cut out. In no way a deal breaker, There was also the ratio discrepancy that white43 pointed out above.

Still, great piece of work and very highly recommended.

8/10
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
(Updated: September 12, 2012)
Enjoyment
 
8.0
August 10, 2010

I can’t really add anything that hasn’t been said above. I enjoyed this far more than Jorge’s Raiders. I really liked the removal of boom town and the gophers. I noted no issues in sound and the picture quality was fine.

I did however note two technical issues in this edit from the DVD:

Indy, Mutt and Marion in the back on the truck – there’s a fractional visual of an apparent cut scene, maybe just a couple frames. Later, there’s a scene where Mutt jumps from a vehicle I believe. The shot is below him – the AR visibly changes. I have the timings of exactly when these issues do occur written down at home and can send them to you.

Other than that, very nice.
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
(Updated: September 12, 2012)
Enjoyment
 
7.0
August 4, 2010

*This rating was given before reviews were required*
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
13 results - showing 6 - 10
1 2 3