Review Detail
8.8 3 10
Overall rating
9.0
Audio/Video Quality
8.0
Audio Editing
10.0
Visual Editing
10.0
Narrative
8.0
Enjoyment
9.0
This was a really nice edit. The only familiarity I have with Oz is Gatos' edit, so this was a nice "clean" viewing for me as a sequel.
Overall I really enjoyed it. It couldn't help feeling episodic at times but it wasn't off-putting. The biggest flaw in the narrative was Keller's story seemed really unbalanced and I didn't quite believe his constant 180s in character. Since I haven't watched my DVDs yet for the show I don't know if this was due to Adabisi's cutting or he was a shitty character in the show.
A/V quality was what it was. Editing was good. A worthy sequel to, but not as great as, Emerald City: An Oz Fanedit.
Overall I really enjoyed it. It couldn't help feeling episodic at times but it wasn't off-putting. The biggest flaw in the narrative was Keller's story seemed really unbalanced and I didn't quite believe his constant 180s in character. Since I haven't watched my DVDs yet for the show I don't know if this was due to Adabisi's cutting or he was a shitty character in the show.
A/V quality was what it was. Editing was good. A worthy sequel to, but not as great as, Emerald City: An Oz Fanedit.
User Review
Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
DVD
N