Dracula: Restored

Updated
 
9.5 (9)
6477 0 1 0 4

User reviews

9 reviews
 
89%
 
11%
5-7 stars
 
0%
3-5 stars
 
0%
1-3 stars
 
0%
Overall rating
 
9.5
Audio/Video Quality
 
9.9(9)
Audio Editing
 
9.7(9)
Visual Editing
 
9.6(9)
Narrative
 
9.0(9)
Enjoyment
 
9.1(9)
Back to Listing
9 results - showing 1 - 5
1 2
Ordering
Overall rating
 
9.2
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
8.0
Enjoyment
 
8.0
Great job. I always wished I could like this film more, and now, I do. Its not one of the best of the 1930s Universal horror flicks despite Lugosi's blazing performance, but with this edit we see a bit more of what might have been.

User Review

Format Watched?
Digital
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
Incredible work.

With new footage integrated seamlessly (I honestly couldn't spot a single frame that looked out of place, even in the non-purist cut) and existing footage rearranged, this edit is revelatory when it comes to this film. A timeless classic is taken to yet another level with the changes, and I can't see myself going back to the original for anything other than educational purposes.

Really impressive to see what can be done even with a film as well known and classic as this.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
Blu-Ray
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
(Updated: October 01, 2023)
Overall rating
 
9.6
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
9.0
Enjoyment
 
9.0
(This review is based off of a message I sent to the fan editor on another forum some time ago.)

Great work. It's easy to dismiss Lugosi's performance because it's been parodied throughout the years, but I've always felt that he was incredible in the role - it's just hard to remember that since everything about his Dracula has become a cliche. But when we forget those preconceptions, and simply watch his performance and take it for what it is, I think he does amazing work. Of course, the problem's always been the film which carried his performance. It's difficult to sit through, because of two reasons - its play-like pacing and the jumbled continuity of the second half of the film.

This edit does much to mend the first and almost entirely fixes the second. The movie feels more like a film and - dare I say it - makes sense. Parts of the film, particularly later, are a still a bit slow, but certainly not to the point of taking the joy out of watching it. Renfield's character makes so much more sense, and I'm able to enjoy his maniacal presence much more. I can't speak for the dead (or the undead for that matter) but I suspect that Browning would have appreciated this effort. I think Billy Batson has given us the best version we can possibly get out of this film.

I do have two suggestions that go beyond the bounds of the original film(s). The first is to address the issue of Lucy. We can infer the Van Helsing will kill her; however, I had an idea that I thought might work. At the very end, where Mina and Harker go up the spiral staircase while the bells ring before it fades out, maybe the editor could add words on the screen explicitly revealing her fate: "The vampire Lucy Weston was found and destroyed by Professor Van Helsing. The fate of Dracula's wives remains unknown." I think that might really work. And it would add an unsettling somberness to an otherwise happy resolution.

My second suggestion is one I'm not even too sure about: sampling other parts of Swan Lake in other scenes scenes in the film. I'm not suggesting that a score for the film from Swan Lake be created - but perhaps a few notes here and there might quicken the pace during moments when the film is slow. Then again, perhaps it's best that there is no music. Between the Swan Lake opening and the church bells at the end, I don't believe there's any music in the film, and this has a symbolic significance (music is dead while Dracula 'lives'). Also, silence adds a lot to the eeriness of Dracula.

To close, let me commend the editor once again. They say a film is 'written' three times - when it is written, when it is directed, and when it is edited. Editing can save or destroy a film - editing saved the original Star Wars film, turning a bad movie into a good one. The reverse is true for Dracula. Studio editing ruined Browning's story, but I'm happy to now have a version which restores that tale. I suspect that even the original was far from a great movie, but this re-edit strongly suggests to me that it was at least a good one, and I'm happy to be able to finally enjoy it.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched?
Digital
D
Top 500 Reviewer 6 reviews
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
Overall rating
 
9.2
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
9.0
Narrative
 
8.0
Enjoyment
 
9.0
I watched the non-purist cut of this (blu-ray) which contained elements from both versions of the film, and I honestly couldn't discern which shots didn't belong to the original. The entire thing is masterfully done and vastly superior to the theatrical release. I didn't notice anything awry audio-wise and, apart from some overly quick fades (which others have also noted), visual editing was excellent as well.

The narrative is much improved, although, due to lost footage, it can never be perfect. The story isn't massively well told and I can't imagine it making a great deal of sense to those who aren't familiar with the book. Still, this is probably it at the best it can be, and the pacing is also so much better as a result of the re-ordering of scenes and minor trims.

Does this replace the original for me? Probably. I'm still yet to watch through the Spanish language version and I'd also like to see the theatrical once more so that I can give the alternative soundtrack a proper spin. But off the top my head - yeah... this is it. Really well done, and clearly with a great deal of respect for the source material. Highly recommended.
T
Top 50 Reviewer 103 reviews
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
What's so divine about this edit is that Kristen Stewart has been removed almost entirely. Unfortunately, all the Kate Beckinsale scenes were excised, which should make the People for the Ethical Treatment of Werewolves rather happy, I guess. The scenes were reordered so that Van Helsing comes off as an even greater know-it-all badass, in that he clearly foresees the production of Blacula.
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 2
9 results - showing 1 - 5
1 2